Thank you for your kind words. We hear a lot of good things about GeNIe and SMILE from their users. They are in no way inferior in their functionality, speed, and reliability to the "crazily expensive" software and are only getting better with time.
Cheers,
Marek
Search found 454 matches
- Fri Apr 10, 2026 10:40 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4941
- Thu Apr 09, 2026 10:25 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4941
Re: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
I'd like to confirm that you cannot pass posterior/marginal probability distributions as arguments to other nodes in a model. The main reason for this design decision is that we make a clear distinction between definitions/domains and values. Inference algorithms calculate values (including ...
- Wed Apr 08, 2026 9:13 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4941
Re: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
I may be understanding your description incorrectly (I had a hard time connecting the models to your description, as you are using different symbols -- it may be obvious for you but it is not for me :-)), but is your question related to being able to use probability distributions as arguments to ...
- Sat Jan 24, 2026 6:47 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: EM algorithm
- Replies: 3
- Views: 23509
Re: EM algorithm
I'm afraid we don't use any smoothing, at least consciously :-). Can you tell use more about it?
Cheers,
Marek
Cheers,
Marek
- Fri Oct 31, 2025 10:03 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Getting expectation from distirbution node
- Replies: 2
- Views: 47162
Re: Getting expectation from distirbution node
You can operate on values but not on their statistical properties (i.e., results) in your equations. Please keep in mind that a Bayesian network is equivalent to a system of simultaneous equations. Your new variable could have a conditional statement that compares the number of positive cases to ...
- Wed May 07, 2025 12:03 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Monte Carlo Sampling
- Replies: 3
- Views: 266090
Re: Monte Carlo Sampling
I hope I understand your query correctly, as it contains several terms that could mean various things (like "bottom event", "base event", "upper and lower values", "failure probability", "fuzzy function"). It seems to me that what you want to do cannot be done in GeNIe but you can do almost anything ...
- Mon Apr 28, 2025 11:36 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Monte Carlo Sampling
- Replies: 3
- Views: 266090
Re: Monte Carlo Sampling
Most certainly. GeNIe and SMILE include several Monte Carlo sampling algorithms and produce samples for each of the nodes in the model, whether the model is discrete, continuous or hybrid. Please look at the section on algorithms for Bayesian networks.
Cheers,
Marek
Cheers,
Marek
- Mon Apr 14, 2025 10:16 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
- Replies: 5
- Views: 346149
Re: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
By changing the definition of the child node. The conditional probability distributions describe precisely the impact that the parents have on it. In your model, the conditional probability distributions (columns in your CPT) are all equal.
I hope this helps,
Marek
I hope this helps,
Marek
- Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:23 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
- Replies: 5
- Views: 346149
Re: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
The guilty element of your model is the CPT in n10:
s0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
s1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Please note that the probability distribution over n10 is not impacted by the parents.
Does this help?
Marek
s0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
s1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Please note that the probability distribution over n10 is not impacted by the parents.
Does this help?
Marek
- Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:10 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
- Replies: 5
- Views: 346149
Re: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
Thank you for sending me your model. I have looked at it and saw that quite likely you mean the nodes n0, n6, n3, n4, n12 , n11 and n9 in your obfuscated model. Each of these nodes is defined by a CPT that consist of only zeros and ones. Zero and one are special numbers in probability theory. Once a ...
- Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:40 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 266807
Re: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
Both parameters are accessible from the Learn New Network dialog. The upper right pop-up menu allows you for choosing the algorithm. Have you actually looked at GeNIe manual :-)? You can send me the data set by a private message on the Forum or by Email (marek@bayesfusion.com).
Cheers,
Marek
Cheers,
Marek
- Fri Apr 11, 2025 9:50 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 266807
Re: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
Hi Ellen,
If the algorithm that you are using is the PC algorithm, it is possible that the structure that it discovers is too complex. There may be nodes that have many parents. In that case, the crash occurs when you go to the next step, i.e., learn parameters. The probability tables are huge and ...
If the algorithm that you are using is the PC algorithm, it is possible that the structure that it discovers is too complex. There may be nodes that have many parents. In that case, the crash occurs when you go to the next step, i.e., learn parameters. The probability tables are huge and ...
- Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:35 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Logically Impossible CPT
- Replies: 1
- Views: 249761
Re: Logically Impossible CPT
A probability distribution that does not add up to one is impossible and wrong. GeNIe will not let you exit the dialog in which you enter such distribution. I don't know for sure, just guessing, but I think that you may want to represent a dummy probability distribution that will never be used in ...
- Thu Mar 06, 2025 5:23 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
- Replies: 4
- Views: 305871
Re: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
Thank you for the additional description. The lognormalCDF() does make sense (I assume that this is what your theory dictates). I still think that if you want to make the two nodes parents of Node5, you should make sure that the discretization of both makes sense and then specify the CPT of Node5 ...
- Wed Mar 05, 2025 1:24 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
- Replies: 4
- Views: 305871
Re: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
I will be happy to try to help. I have a hard time understanding the definition of the node "damage state". You are making several calls to the Uniform() function and this confuses me somewhat. Please note that as Uniform() generates a random number from the Uniform distribution, each time you call ...