Search found 449 matches
- Wed May 07, 2025 12:03 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Monte Carlo Sampling
- Replies: 3
- Views: 25267
Re: Monte Carlo Sampling
I hope I understand your query correctly, as it contains several terms that could mean various things (like "bottom event", "base event", "upper and lower values", "failure probability", "fuzzy function"). It seems to me that what you want to do cannot be done in GeNIe but you can do almost anything ...
- Mon Apr 28, 2025 11:36 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Monte Carlo Sampling
- Replies: 3
- Views: 25267
Re: Monte Carlo Sampling
Most certainly. GeNIe and SMILE include several Monte Carlo sampling algorithms and produce samples for each of the nodes in the model, whether the model is discrete, continuous or hybrid. Please look at the section on algorithms for Bayesian networks.
Cheers,
Marek
Cheers,
Marek
- Mon Apr 14, 2025 10:16 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
- Replies: 5
- Views: 52005
Re: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
By changing the definition of the child node. The conditional probability distributions describe precisely the impact that the parents have on it. In your model, the conditional probability distributions (columns in your CPT) are all equal.
I hope this helps,
Marek
I hope this helps,
Marek
- Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:23 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
- Replies: 5
- Views: 52005
Re: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
The guilty element of your model is the CPT in n10:
s0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
s1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Please note that the probability distribution over n10 is not impacted by the parents.
Does this help?
Marek
s0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
s1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Please note that the probability distribution over n10 is not impacted by the parents.
Does this help?
Marek
- Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:10 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
- Replies: 5
- Views: 52005
Re: Nodes not having an effect on sensitivity
Thank you for sending me your model. I have looked at it and saw that quite likely you mean the nodes n0, n6, n3, n4, n12 , n11 and n9 in your obfuscated model. Each of these nodes is defined by a CPT that consist of only zeros and ones. Zero and one are special numbers in probability theory. Once a ...
- Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:40 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 32036
Re: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
Both parameters are accessible from the Learn New Network dialog. The upper right pop-up menu allows you for choosing the algorithm. Have you actually looked at GeNIe manual :-)? You can send me the data set by a private message on the Forum or by Email (marek@bayesfusion.com).
Cheers,
Marek
Cheers,
Marek
- Fri Apr 11, 2025 9:50 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 32036
Re: GeNIe crash, too much variables?
Hi Ellen,
If the algorithm that you are using is the PC algorithm, it is possible that the structure that it discovers is too complex. There may be nodes that have many parents. In that case, the crash occurs when you go to the next step, i.e., learn parameters. The probability tables are huge and ...
If the algorithm that you are using is the PC algorithm, it is possible that the structure that it discovers is too complex. There may be nodes that have many parents. In that case, the crash occurs when you go to the next step, i.e., learn parameters. The probability tables are huge and ...
- Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:35 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Logically Impossible CPT
- Replies: 1
- Views: 61313
Re: Logically Impossible CPT
A probability distribution that does not add up to one is impossible and wrong. GeNIe will not let you exit the dialog in which you enter such distribution. I don't know for sure, just guessing, but I think that you may want to represent a dummy probability distribution that will never be used in ...
- Thu Mar 06, 2025 5:23 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
- Replies: 4
- Views: 73574
Re: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
Thank you for the additional description. The lognormalCDF() does make sense (I assume that this is what your theory dictates). I still think that if you want to make the two nodes parents of Node5, you should make sure that the discretization of both makes sense and then specify the CPT of Node5 ...
- Wed Mar 05, 2025 1:24 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
- Replies: 4
- Views: 73574
Re: Question about connection between Chance node and Equation node
I will be happy to try to help. I have a hard time understanding the definition of the node "damage state". You are making several calls to the Uniform() function and this confuses me somewhat. Please note that as Uniform() generates a random number from the Uniform distribution, each time you call ...
- Fri Feb 28, 2025 2:31 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: GeNle arrangement of nodes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 24619
Re: GeNle arrangement of nodes
Absolutely! Please try Layout menu and then Graph Layout. There are two simple algorithms that do a reasonable job in rearranging nodes for readability.
I hope this helps,
Marek
I hope this helps,
Marek
- Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:48 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Influence Diagram
- Replies: 4
- Views: 36290
Re: Influence Diagram
Hi Salim,
The screen shots are not originating from GeNIe and are confusing. My original advice is still standing. You should change the uniform probabilities into the probability distributions that will be there when the node Risks has no effect on the children nodes.
Cheers,
Marek
The screen shots are not originating from GeNIe and are confusing. My original advice is still standing. You should change the uniform probabilities into the probability distributions that will be there when the node Risks has no effect on the children nodes.
Cheers,
Marek
- Mon Dec 09, 2024 9:55 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Influence Diagram
- Replies: 4
- Views: 36290
Re: Influence Diagram
Hi Salim,
I will be happy to help you but need to understand better what you want. Would you be willing to create and post the simplest possible influence diagram that does what you want? In general, uniform probabilities do not sound like a good idea in this case. I would keep the probabilities ...
I will be happy to help you but need to understand better what you want. Would you be willing to create and post the simplest possible influence diagram that does what you want? In general, uniform probabilities do not sound like a good idea in this case. I would keep the probabilities ...
- Thu Sep 26, 2024 9:18 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: Calculating the probability of evidence across equation nodes
- Replies: 5
- Views: 54991
Re: Calculating the probability of evidence across equation nodes
Hi Maghnie,
The silent crash has to do with the fact that we have not yet programmed this functionality for continuous nodes. We will fix this in one of the next releases. To make it work at the moment, please change the type of the continuous nodes from continuous/equation to discrete chance nodes ...
The silent crash has to do with the fact that we have not yet programmed this functionality for continuous nodes. We will fix this in one of the next releases. To make it work at the moment, please change the type of the continuous nodes from continuous/equation to discrete chance nodes ...
- Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:46 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: BBN model for Risk Assessment
- Replies: 1
- Views: 29394
Re: BBN model for Risk Assessment
It seems to me that this is a data set that you can use to train a Bayesian network. An influence diagram would require explicit decisions and also a utility function. Your data set is small (34 records) and you cannot really learn anything useful from data alone. If you create a BN model based on ...