Bugs with decision nodes as parents of nature nodes

The engine.
Post Reply
andrew_ling
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 11:16 pm

Bugs with decision nodes as parents of nature nodes

Post by andrew_ling »

It appears that there is a bug with decision nodes as parent of nature nodes in the Smile engine. Please import the following Netica file to see the bug.

Andrew
Attachments
Product_Development_Example.xdsl
Please change the extension of this file to dne.
(2.99 KiB) Downloaded 546 times
Last edited by andrew_ling on Fri May 16, 2008 3:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
shooltz[BayesFusion]
Site Admin
Posts: 1417
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:51 pm

Re: Bugs with decision nodes as parents of nature nodes

Post by shooltz[BayesFusion] »

andrew_ling wrote:Please import the following Netica file to see the bug.
There's no file attached to your post.
andrew_ling
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 11:16 pm

Post by andrew_ling »

Updated.
shooltz[BayesFusion]
Site Admin
Posts: 1417
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:51 pm

Re: Bugs with decision nodes as parents of nature nodes

Post by shooltz[BayesFusion] »

andrew_ling wrote:It appears that there is a bug with decision nodes as parent of nature nodes in the Smile engine. Please import the following Netica file to see the bug.
The file loads OK with the following warning messages logged (despite the 'ERROR' prefix, they're just warnings):

(line 13) : ERROR: 'NodeMaxNumEntries' : Unknown Visual Net Statement
(line 22) : ERROR: 'PrinterSetting' : Unknown Visual Net Statement
(line 35) : ERROR: 'New_Thorough' : '(' expected
(line 112) : ERROR: 'ElimOrder' : Unknown Net Statement

The "unknown [visual] net statement" can be safely ignored. I've checked the condition which leads to "'(' expected", and it's also safe to ignore, because SMILE doesn't use the data in 'functable' for decision nodes.

Is there anything else that I'm missing about the attached file?
Post Reply