BayesFusion Support Forum

You got it right.
I solved the problem by saving the probabilities before clearing the evidence and re-define the nodes with the previously updated probabilities.

In this way, I was able to use a not dynamic network and at the same time I decided which CPTs maintain or reset to original prior ...

I am trying to find a way to update the network giving the true value of a node, and then deleting only that value but still having the updated probabilities of the other nodes, also the ones that depend on that node. I am using rSMILE:


# Save the obtain probabilities for the signals:
signals ...