Search found 39 matches
- Fri Apr 10, 2026 9:52 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4882
Re: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
I understand your very sensible design choice! I'll stay with linking human distortions to accuracy nodes, instead of linking them to dichotomic stimulus nodes. As for your question... agenarisk and netica do not allow passing distributions, same as GeNIe. I do not know anything about the crazily ...
- Thu Apr 09, 2026 8:34 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4882
Re: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
Hi Marek, I apologize for obscurity in the previous post. I think you grasped it correctly but, to be sure, I try with a more neat example. In the attached mininet there is a stimulus (.5 priors), a human detector with accuracy .9 (it is a point prob in the example, but please consider that it would ...
- Tue Apr 07, 2026 9:10 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4882
passing posterior probs of a dichotomous node to a probebility weigh node
Hello,
in our studies we often need to distort accurate probability estimates to match actual estimates made by subjects. In the attached example (a small subset extracted from a larger hierarchical model) the "linlog" (linear-to-log-odds) equation in the network properties is one of many possible ...
in our studies we often need to distort accurate probability estimates to match actual estimates made by subjects. In the attached example (a small subset extracted from a larger hierarchical model) the "linlog" (linear-to-log-odds) equation in the network properties is one of many possible ...
- Sat Mar 28, 2026 3:15 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: Is there a way to use a net as a DataGenerator in the rSmile Wrap?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6921
Is there a way to use a net as a DataGenerator in the rSmile Wrap?
Hello,
I found in the C++ smile manual a whole set of functions for generating data from a network (section 8.12). But I could not find any way to use DataGenerator in the rSmile wrap (and all my code is in R, alas). Is it possible to use a net as a data generator in rSmile?
Thx
I found in the C++ smile manual a whole set of functions for generating data from a network (section 8.12). But I could not find any way to use DataGenerator in the rSmile wrap (and all my code is in R, alas). Is it possible to use a net as a data generator in rSmile?
Thx
- Wed Mar 04, 2026 7:10 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: possible bug?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12128
Re: possible bug?
Ok. I confirm your observations, the visualization asymmetry appears in excel, wolfram, etc. Perhaps it springs from some bias toward lower values in visualization algorithms using bins, and if so it should not affect the accuracy of the network. Thank you!
- Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:10 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: possible bug?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12128
possible bug?
Hello,
premise: I replicated the suspect behavior in the attached small three-node non-discretized equation nodes, but I observed it in a larger network where I do not know if it might posit a problem, or not. The function Max(1,Min(13,Uniform(-6,6)+Uniform(1,13)) should be symmetric, with two peaks ...
premise: I replicated the suspect behavior in the attached small three-node non-discretized equation nodes, but I observed it in a larger network where I do not know if it might posit a problem, or not. The function Max(1,Min(13,Uniform(-6,6)+Uniform(1,13)) should be symmetric, with two peaks ...
- Mon Jun 02, 2025 2:37 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: zero avoidance in discretization apparently does not work properly
- Replies: 5
- Views: 361951
Re: zero avoidance in discretization apparently does not work properly
Ok, thank you, I can wait for next release.
- Wed May 14, 2025 6:14 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: zero avoidance in discretization apparently does not work properly
- Replies: 5
- Views: 361951
Re: zero avoidance in discretization apparently does not work properly
Sorry, I wrote the other way around what I really meant. I originally meant "I need a node that DOES NOT avoid zeroes (first original image), but even though I deselect zeroavoidance, any time it is rediscretized for updating it avoids zeroes (second original image)". Then I solved the problem ...
- Sun May 04, 2025 9:44 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: zero avoidance in discretization apparently does not work properly
- Replies: 5
- Views: 361951
zero avoidance in discretization apparently does not work properly
I need zero avoidance in the discretization of some equation nodes with intrinsic (and logically important) zeroes. The option in network preferences works when I push the button "rediscretize":
Screenshot 2025-05-04 alle 11.39.15.png
but as soon as close the node properties windows and I open it ...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 alle 11.39.15.png
but as soon as close the node properties windows and I open it ...
- Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:37 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: possible bug in noisy MAX nodes, version 5.0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 204988
- Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:23 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: possible bug in noisy MAX nodes, version 5.0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 204988
possible bug in noisy MAX nodes, version 5.0
Hi, in GeNIe academic 5.0 (installed on a Mac 32 bit by Crossover) the noisy max nodes, Net parameters window, do not allow switching between parents' states. The menu for switching states appears, but it stays gray and is inactive (see attached picture; the picture is from one of your noisy max ...
- Mon Nov 11, 2024 4:12 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Copy and paste problem with GeNIe 5
- Replies: 2
- Views: 147233
Re: Copy and paste problem with GeNIe 5
Yes, sorry for having wasted your time. I forgot that the solution the previous time was 32-bit installation. Now it works, thanks.
- Sat Nov 02, 2024 10:33 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Copy and paste problem with GeNIe 5
- Replies: 2
- Views: 147233
Copy and paste problem with GeNIe 5
Hello,
the newly released GeNIe version 5 does not allow to copy networks from GeNIe and paste them as TIFF images to microsoft word (nor microsoft power point; I did not check for other softwares). Genie 4.1 still allowed it. I remember having reported a similar bug for the transition between two ...
the newly released GeNIe version 5 does not allow to copy networks from GeNIe and paste them as TIFF images to microsoft word (nor microsoft power point; I did not check for other softwares). Genie 4.1 still allowed it. I remember having reported a similar bug for the transition between two ...
- Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:25 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Strange behavior of TruncNormal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 277151
Re: Strange behavior of TruncNormal
We do get funny (in terms of being large) number of samples in forward inference for small and large values of evidence in v1 (e.g., 0..1, 1..2, 8..9, and 9..10 :-).
:-) Where can you see the number of samples that are generated? In my GeNIe the output windows report them only when there are some ...
:-) Where can you see the number of samples that are generated? In my GeNIe the output windows report them only when there are some ...
- Wed Feb 28, 2024 10:15 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Strange behavior of TruncNormal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 277151
Re: Strange behavior of TruncNormal
This is for contextualising the theoretical problem only. It is a small fragment (the complete case has some more clues) of an old italian murder case that I use as an example in class. Bare data for the fragment:
1) a victim V is murdered (by stabbing) in her house and is found - more or less ...
1) a victim V is murdered (by stabbing) in her house and is found - more or less ...