any solution?frito wrote:On the same machine when I added the above discussed setup lines to a Matlab setup file I was able to load the smilenet.dll into Matlab.
But I would like to work with smile in VS 2010, where the problem remains.
Search found 32 matches
- Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:26 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: VS 2010, VB, Mixed mode assembly is built against version...
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3721
Re: VS 2010, VB, Mixed mode assembly is built against versio
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:33 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_SCLC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5043
Re: error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_
The information below is copied directly from SMILE download page: SMILE distributions for Visual C++ contais three sets of libraries: two optimized builds for static and dynamic CRT, and another unoptimized build linking against debug DLL runtime without NDEBUG defined. smile.h and smilearn.h cont...
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:53 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: VS 2010, VB, Mixed mode assembly is built against version...
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3721
Re: VS 2010, VB, Mixed mode assembly is built against versio
On the same machine when I added the above discussed setup lines to a Matlab setup file I was able to load the smilenet.dll into Matlab.
But I would like to work with smile in VS 2010, where the problem remains.
But I would like to work with smile in VS 2010, where the problem remains.
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:50 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_SCLC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5043
Re: error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_
Hi shooltz I keep getting "error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_SCL must be defined and set to zero for VS.NET 2005 or later" That's because you didn't define _SECURE_SCL=0 for the release build. Where/how do I do taht? (when building Debug I get many "error LNK2038:...
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:06 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: VS 2010, VB, Mixed mode assembly is built against version...
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3721
VS 2010, VB, Mixed mode assembly is built against version...
Hi I get a runtime error in VS 2010 VB "Mixed mode assembly is built against version 'v1.1.4322' of the runtime and cannot be loaded in the 4.0 runtime without additional configuration information." I tried to followed advices I found on the net (adding <?xml version="1.0" encodi...
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:33 pm
- Forum: SMILE
- Topic: error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_SCLC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5043
error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_SCLC
Hi I keep getting "error C1189: #error : SMILE : in release build _SECURE_SCL must be defined and set to zero for VS.NET 2005 or later ..." Am running VS 2010 VC++. (when building Debug I get many "error LNK2038: mismatch detected for '_ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL': ...", then some LNK2...
- Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:09 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: genie feature:saving stuff
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4825
Re: genie feature:saving stuff
Save node Evidence/control (load those for an open graph) You can do something like that using Case Manager. If you have the evidence information in text file or ODBC-accessible database, you can also use 'Copy cases' option from 'Data' menu when data spreadsheet view is active. Great :lol: Export ...
- Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:20 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: genie feature:saving stuff
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4825
genie feature:saving stuff
I think it would be handy and also pretty dandy if one could:
Save node Evidence/control (load those for an open graph)
Export Strength of influence values
Show scores interactively (e.g. the way p(e) is implemented )
Save node Evidence/control (load those for an open graph)
Export Strength of influence values
Show scores interactively (e.g. the way p(e) is implemented )
- Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:05 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Pattern editor- randomization
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6261
Pattern editor- randomization
Nice one can save the pattern now
Why the RANDOMIZATION doesnt produce DAG instead of just plain random directions?
Why the RANDOMIZATION doesnt produce DAG instead of just plain random directions?
- Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:50 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: PC structure learning
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11356
The previous implementation was correct, except that it selected only one of the graphs in the equivalence class instead of showing them all. Did you try increasing the maximum number of adjacent nodes? Would you mind sharing your data? Thats good news Mark I can use them then :P Here are the data,...
- Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:31 am
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: PC structure learning
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11356
You should use the latest GeNIe version. It contains the most recent implementation of the PC algorithm and outputs a pattern and not a DAG, as it should. It also checks for missing data which is not allowed. Thanks for the suggestion on saving the pattern, I'll see what I can do about that. How is...
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:41 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: PC structure learning
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11356
bugs?
with build 2937 I can learn PC structures with continuous with missing replaced by mean it doesnt whos me the Pattern editor (probably not implemented there yet). But it seems it produces a DAG instead of a PDAG?? PC should result into a PDAG. How should I interpret such DAG? build 3092 shows the pa...
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:06 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: PC structure learning
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11356
PC indeed doesn't discretize the variables if they are continuous. It uses partial correlation in combination with the Z-test to establish conditional independence. Do other PC implementations limit the maximum number of adjacent nodes? This is a big time saver. Hi Mark yes the ones in BNT and SLP ...
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:04 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: PC structure learning
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11356
PC structure learning
Since PC uses a cond independence test I suppose genie does NOT discretize the data when continuous observations are submited? Also what indep. test it uses Chi^2? How is it possible it is so incredibely FAST, other PC implementations I used for 100 variables simply did not work at all some resulted...
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:36 pm
- Forum: GeNIe
- Topic: Greedy TT structures learning
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5609
Re: Greedy TT structures learning
when I submit continuous data to get a structure, are the data first discretized by Genie or the score calculation is done on the original continuous data? If any data column selected for learning is continous, GeNIe will not run GTT - you'll get the "Selected algorithm doesn't support contino...